The Hidden Motive Behind JFK’s Assassination: My Perspective on the Battle Against Fiat Currency

The assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, has always intrigued me—not just because of its historical significance but because of what it represents in the fight for financial sovereignty. The more I researched, the more I realized that the conventional narrative of a lone gunman simply doesn’t add up. One of the most compelling reasons behind JFK’s assassination, in my view, was his bold attempt to challenge the Federal Reserve and the fiat currency system that benefits a select group of powerful elites. His introduction of Executive Order 11110, which allowed the U.S. Treasury to issue silver-backed currency, threatened the global banking system controlled by institutions like the Rothschilds.

Kennedy’s Bold Stand Against Fiat Currency

Before Kennedy took office, the United States was already deeply entangled in a monetary system controlled by the Federal Reserve, a private central bank that dictates the country’s money supply and interest rates. Established in 1913, the Federal Reserve operates outside the direct control of the U.S. government and is heavily influenced by global banking families, including the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Morgans.

What struck me the most was how these elites thrive on a fiat currency system, meaning money is printed without tangible backing, leading to inflation and an endless cycle of debt. Kennedy, however, saw through this and took decisive action. On June 4, 1963, he signed Executive Order 11110, which allowed the U.S. Treasury to issue silver certificates, directly backed by physical silver reserves rather than relying on Federal Reserve notes. This was a direct challenge to the monopoly of the Federal Reserve over money creation, and it represented a significant step toward restoring the economic power of the people.

The Banking System’s Response to Kennedy’s Actions

The implications of Executive Order 11110 were massive. If fully implemented, this order could have gradually phased out Federal Reserve Notes, reducing the power of international bankers. The more I studied this, the clearer it became that Kennedy’s plan was a threat to the Rothschild-controlled banking network, which relies on interest-based lending and debt cycles to maintain control over national economies.

Unlike the inflationary fiat system, Kennedy’s move toward sound money threatened to dismantle the mechanisms that kept entire nations in perpetual debt servitude. The eerie part? Five months after signing the order, Kennedy was assassinated. This alone raises critical questions about whether his monetary policies played a key role in his untimely demise.

Allen Dulles: The CIA, the Warren Commission, and Banking Elites

Another key figure who raises serious suspicions is Allen Dulles, the former CIA Director and a member of the Warren Commission, the body tasked with investigating JFK’s assassination. Why was he involved? Well, it’s important to note that Kennedy had fired Dulles in 1961 following the Bay of Pigs invasion debacle—a major embarrassment for the CIA. Kennedy’s removal of Dulles was essentially an act of defiance against the deep state, a network of intelligence and financial operatives who wield significant control over global affairs.

Dulles and his brother, John Foster Dulles, were deeply connected to international banking elites, particularly the Rothschilds. Through their law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, they worked with European banking houses, including the Warburgs and Schiffs, who played pivotal roles in financing global conflicts and shaping central banks. To me, this connection cannot be ignored.

As part of the Warren Commission, Dulles ensured that Kennedy’s assassination was framed as the work of a lone gunman, conveniently dismissing any theories that implicated the Federal Reserve, CIA, or banking elites. His role in shaping the official narrative allowed those who stood to benefit from Kennedy’s removal—including the Federal Reserve and its backers—to continue their operations unchallenged.

The Reversal of Kennedy’s Economic Policies

Another undeniable fact is that after Kennedy’s assassination, Lyndon B. Johnson took office and quickly reversed his predecessor’s economic policies. Within months, Executive Order 11110 was quietly shelved, and no further silver-backed currency was issued. Johnson had strong ties to corporate and banking elites and fully aligned with the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies. This shift marked the beginning of an era where fiat currency became the undisputed financial system, leading to Nixon’s complete abandonment of the gold standard in 1971.

This was a major win for the banking cartel, ensuring that private bankers retained full control over the global economy—a power they continue to hold today. Had Kennedy’s policy been fully realized, the Federal Reserve’s dominance might have been broken, and we could be living in a very different economic world today.

Conclusion: Why This Still Matters Today

Kennedy’s assassination was not just a historical event—it was a pivotal moment in the battle between sovereign governments and the private banking elite. His challenge to the fiat currency system, his moves to decentralize financial power, and his resistance to intelligence overreach put him on a collision course with the most powerful financial and political interests in the world.

As someone who has spent years studying the patterns of global control, I firmly believe that Kennedy was taken out because he was willing to challenge the established order. Allen Dulles, acting as an agent of the banking elites, played a crucial role in ensuring the truth never saw the light of day. The Rothschild-linked banking networks, the CIA, and high-level government operatives had every reason to protect their monetary empire, and eliminating Kennedy was their way of safeguarding their control.

Kennedy was one of the last American presidents to openly challenge the power of international finance and the Federal Reserve system. His fate serves as a warning to anyone who dares to disrupt the entrenched systems of global control. I hope that by shedding light on these connections, more people will begin to question the narratives fed to us by mainstream sources and seek out the truth for themselves.

The fight for economic sovereignty is far from over. It’s up to us to remain informed, vigilant, and committed to challenging the structures that keep us financially enslaved.